Hierarchy of urban agglomerations and attraction theory: case study of Laghouat
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Architecture, Ammar Telidji, Laghouat, Algeria
2
Department of Architecture, University of May 8th, 1945, Guelma, Algeria
These authors had equal contribution to this work
Submission date: 2024-09-07
Final revision date: 2025-01-19
Acceptance date: 2025-02-10
Publication date: 2025-04-14
Corresponding author
Brahim Amor Tabai
Department of Architecture, Ammar Telidji, PB 37 G, (03000), Laghouat, Algeria, 03000, Laghouat, Algeria
Geomatics, Landmanagement and Landscape 2025;(1)
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Based on the observation of the great imbalance in the development policies in the rural urban centers of the wilaya of Laghouat, which caused the exacerbation of the phenomenon of rural displacement towards the capital of the wilaya and the emergence of the unemployment crisis, and in addition to all this the gross lack of provision of necessary services and facilities that contribute to the stabilization and stability of the population, this study came as an attempt to determine the urban pattern ‘dysfunctional/balanced’. The study also seeks to determine whether the urban system of the network of urban centers in the wilaya of Laghouat takes the pattern of the first dominant city or takes the regular pattern. The aim is providing planners with the opportunity to control the direction and distribution of the development process in a regular and equiTable manner and reduce the intensity of urban dominance to break the population concentration confined to the state capital. The article is based on the latest statistical data issued by the Directorate of Planning and Programming of the wilaya of Laghouat ‘2023’ with a comprehensive sample of all municipalities of the region ‘24’. It also uses mathematical measurement models for urban growth and concentration ‘Lorenz’s curve and index, Hoover’s index, and Zipf ’s rank and size base,’ in addition to a comprehensive comparative study of groups of jobs as well as economic and service activities. The study showed strong variations in that the environmental frame does not correspond to human exploitation, as spatial boundaries reflect a spatial political organization that is inconsistent with ideal hierarchical relationships.
REFERENCES (42)
1.
Abdallah M. 2015. Indicators of Urban Dominance for the City of Najaf. Geographical Research Journal.
2.
Aikali A. 2009. Economic composition of the population in the Kingdom of Bahrain according to the 2001 census. J. Research, Kufa, Iraq.
3.
Al-Anbar A. 2014. An Analytical Study of the Hierarchical Order of Urban Centers in Babil Governorate. Babel, University of Babylon, Iraq.
4.
Alarabi F. 2023. Population growth in major cities: between urban challenges and developmental opportunities. Riadh, Aspar.
5.
Al-Dajani 2009. Trends of Urban Concentration in the Syrian Arab Republic. Syria, Uiversity of Syria.
6.
Al-Shadid 2012. Spatial Development Disparities in Iraq with Proposed Development Indicators and Targeted Mechanisms. Plan and Developement, 216–238.
7.
Amera M.A. 2021. A Spatial Analysis of the Population of Medhatiya and Abu Gharaq According to their Urban and Rural Environments. J. Humanities, 29, Baghdad, Iraq.
8.
Arshad S. 2018. Zipf’s Law and City Size Distribution. Physica, 75–92.
9.
Ayyana M. 1993. Population geography: foundations and applications. Alexandria, Almaarifa.
10.
Baker D. 2005. Asset Returns and Economic Growth. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 289–330.
11.
Benarfa K. 2018. Role de la reglementation urbaine dans la perservation de l’oasis de Laghouat. Courrier du Savoir, 175–186.
12.
Bouafia A. 2019. Equilibre du réseau urbain et tendances de la concentration urbaine dans la région de Ziban, une étude de cas de Biskra. Batna.
13.
Brahim A. 1999. Statistical methods and geography. Alexandria, Egypt, Almaarifa.
14.
Claude M. 2018. La délimitation des aires d’influence métropolitaine par un modèle de gravité. Le Centre-Ouest de la France. Le Centre-Ouest De La France, France.
15.
Desmet K. 2015. The geography of development within countries. Handbook of Regional, 1457–1517.
16.
Dimou M. 2007. Evolution des hiérarchies urbaines et loi de Zipf: le cas des balkans. R. Développement, 25, 65–86.
17.
Direction de la programmation et suivi budgetaire. 2022. Laghouat.
18.
Duranton G. 2019. Urban growth and its aggregate implications. Nber Working Paper Series.
19.
Entezar J.J. 2016. Apply base rank – sized cities in Iraq for two years 2007, 2030, P. Magazine, 219, Baghdad, Iraq.
20.
Farhi A. 2001. Macrocéphalie et pole d’équilibre: la wilaya de Biskra. Revue espace géographique, 245–255.
21.
Farhi A. 2001. Macrocéphalie et Pôles D’équilibre: La Wilaya De Biskra. Belin. Revue espace geographique, 245–255.
22.
Farhi A. 2002. Wilaya d’Eloued ou le probléme des desparites communales. Journal Algérien des Régions Arides, 62–68.
23.
Ferradji K. 2017. The dynamics of urbanization and its relationship with the disruption of the functional balance of cities. Constantine, University of Constantine.
24.
Henderson J. 2005. Urbanization and growth. Handbook of Economic Growth, 1543–1591.
25.
Jabbar. 2016. The Hierarchical Size of Urban System Cities in Babil Governorate. Journal of the College of Education for Girls for Humanities, 95–112.
26.
Jagt J. 2009. Urban Networks: The Dutch way of territorial. Katowice, Ministry of Housing Planning and the Environment.
27.
Kbeish. 2011. Urban Expansion and Mobility in the Urban Area of the City of Sétif. Setif, University of Setif.
28.
Khaouadja D. 2024. Foundations of Administrative Division in Light of International Experiences as an Entry Point for Local Development: A Comparative Study. The Arab Journal of Administration, 35–52.
29.
Latif H. 2013. Indicators of concentration of the population of the province of Muthanna. A.-U. J. Sciences. Baghdad, Iraq.
30.
Mohamed H. 2023. The dialectic of the relationship between urban concentration and forms of development for the year 2020. Engineering Research Journal, 157–182.
31.
Peter A. 2012. The Hoover Index of Population Concentration and the Demographic Components of Change: An Article in Memory of Andy Isserman. International Regional Science Review.
32.
Piketty T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty First Century. MA, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
33.
Piketty T. 2015. About Capital in the Twenty First Century. American Economic Review, 48–53.
34.
Pumain D. 2012. Une théorie géographique pour la loi de Zipf. Une Théorie Géographique.
35.
Pour La Loi De Zipf, 31–54.
36.
Remmache A. 2022. Urban inflation and the problems of the urban environment. Annaba State as a Model, 15(2), J. Studies, Annaba, Algeria.
37.
Schaffar A. 2022. La loi de Zipf dans la science régionale: entre anciennes controverses et nouvelles perspectives. T.U. Press. HAL Open Science, 1–26.
38.
Selatnia K. 2015. Le Decongestionnement Urbain et Le Desequilibre Micro Regional. Casa De Biskra. Courrier du Savoir, 19, 23–36.
39.
Shaouaoura A. 2012. Planning in rural and urban development. Amman, Dar Al-Maseera, Jordan.
40.
Tareq A. 2022. The role of the state in demographic disruption: Opportunities and challenges. Cairo, National Population Council.
41.
Toumi H. 2023. Population growth and urban revolution: do cities represent incubators and havens for rural residents, and what is their future? Ideas and Horizons, 133–167.
42.
Wesley E. 2017. The Role of Population in Economic Growth. Sage Open, 1–15.