Proposal for introduction 3D object registration into the Polish legal framework
1
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Military University of Technology, Warsaw
2
Department of Geodesy, University of Agriculture in Krakow
These authors had equal contribution to this work
Submission date: 2024-11-21
Final revision date: 2025-02-04
Acceptance date: 2025-02-25
Publication date: 2025-07-10
Corresponding author
Szczepan Budkowski
Uniwersytet Rolniczy, Uniwersytet Rolniczy im. Hugona Kołłątaja w Krakowie, Balicka 253c, 31-120, Kraków, Poland
Uniwersytet Rolniczy, Uniwersytet Rolniczy im. Hugona Kołłątaja w Krakowie, Balicka 253c, 31-120, Kraków, Poland
Geomatics, Landmanagement and Landscape 2025;(2)
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The aim of this article is to answer the question whether it is justified to introduce the registration of 3D objects in the real estate cadastre in Poland, considering the scope of information registered in other countries. This aim requires the discussion of new legal and technical conditions that might be necessary to introduce the registration of 3D objects in the real estate cadastre in the light of the new proposed legal regulations in Poland. The article presents the principles of functioning of the multidimensional cadastre in various countries. The research method includes both the analysis of literature on the registration of cadastral objects and the planned legal regulations. The research focused on the analysis of the scope of information and the method of registering objects in the real estate cadastre in Poland.
The article presents a proposal to amend the geodetic legal and technical regulations concerning both objective and subjective data registered in the real estate cadastre and documents that form the basis for entries in the real estate cadastre. It takes into account the draft of the Layered Development Act, implemented in 2021–2022 at the De Republica Institute. The authors propose changes to the provisions in the existing legal regulations, which would enable the collection, processing, updating and sharing of information on 3D objects and their owners and other entities with the right to dispose of a separate space above or below the ground surface. In order to register 3D objects together with the right to them in accordance with the provisions of the draft Act, the authors recommend introducing the following entity: Zabudowca in
EGB_StatusPodmiotuEwid, as well as a document used to disclose the scope of the 3D object, i.e. the decision to establish the right to develop in EGB_RodzajDokumentu.
REFERENCES (59)
1.
Act of 17 May 1989 – Geodetic and Cartographic Law (Journal of Laws of 2024, item 1151).
3.
Atazadeh B., Kalantari M., Rajabifard A., Ho S. 2017. Modeling building ownership boundaries within BIM environment: A case study in Victoria, Australia. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., 61, 24–38. 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.09.001.
4.
Atazadeh B., Olfat H., Rajabifard A., Kalantari M., Shojaei D., Marjani A.M. 2021. Linking Land Administration Domain Model and BIM environment for 3D digital cadastre in multi-storey buildings. Land Use Policy, 104, Article 105367. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105367.
5.
Bieda A., Bydłosz J., Warchoł A., Balawejder M. 2020. Historical underground structures as 3D cadastral objects. Remote Sens. (Basel), 12, 1547. 10.3390/rs12101547.
6.
Budkowski S., Litwin U., Gniadek J. 2023. Multidimensional cadastre – a modern way of describing space. Publishing House of the University of Agriculture in Krakow.
7.
Budkowski S., Hudecova L., Bujňáková B., Basak S. 2023. Selected legal aspects of the 3D cadastre – a comparative study on the example of Poland and Slovakia. Geomatics, Landmanagement and Landscape. 10.15576/GLL/2023.4 .59,.
8.
Bydłosz J. 2012. Cadastre in Poland – current status and possibilities of transformation in 3D One. Proceedings of the FIG Working Week: Knowing to manage the territory, environmental protection, assessment of cultural heritage, Rome, Italy, 6–10 May 2012, 1–9. http://www.gdmc.nl/3dcadastres... (accessed: 21.09.2020).
9.
Bydłosz J. 2013. Polish cadastral system in the aspect of ISO 19152. Roczniki Geomatyki, 11, 2(59), 13–23.
10.
Bydłosz J. 2014. Modeling of cadastral information. In: Modeling of Spatial Information Patterns. Bielecka E. (Ed.). Military University of Technology, Warsaw, 19–35.
11.
Bydłosz J. 2016. Development of the Polish Cadastral Model Towards 3D Cadastre. 5th International Cadastre Workshop, Athens, Greece, October 18–20, 505–518. fig.net/resources/proceedings/2016/2016_3dcadastre/3Dcad_2016_38.pdf.pdf (accessed: 25.09.2020).
12.
Bydłosz J. 2017. Future 3D cadastre objects in Poland – Future 3D cadastre objects in Poland. Acta Sci. Pol. Adm. Locorum, 16, 231–237.
13.
Bydłosz J. 2018. Future directions of standardization in cadastre. Polish Spatial Information Society, Annals of Geomatics, 16, 2(81), 89–98.
14.
Bydłosz J., Bieda A. 2020a. Developing a UML Model for the 3D Cadastre in Poland. Land, 9(11), 466. 10.3390/land9110466.
15.
Bydłosz J., Bieda A., Parzych P. 2018. Implementation of spatial planning objects in the 3D Cadastral model. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 7, 153.
16.
Cagdas V. 2013. An application domain extension to cityGML for immovable property taxation: A Turkish case study. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 21, 545–555. 10.1016/j.jag.2012.07.013.
17.
Cui J., Broere W., Lin D. 2021. Underground space utilization for urban renewal Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 108. Article 103726, 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103726.
18.
Dawidowicz A., Zysk E., Źróbek R. 2020. Methodological assessment of the Polish land administration system using a fit-for-purpose approach. Geomat. Environ. Zaing., 14, 31–47.
19.
Einführungsgesetz zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuche (EGBGB). 1990. Zivilprozessordnung, Konkursordnung und Gesetz über die Angelegenheiten der freiwilligen Gerichtsbarkeit.
22.
Grundbuchverfügung (GBV). 2021. Verordnung zur Durchführung der Grundbuchordnung vonStudier, Ronny.
23.
Góźdź K., Pachelski W. 2014a. The LADM as a core for developing three-dimensional cadastral data model for Poland. Proceedings of the 14th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM, Albena, Bulgaria, 19–25 June, 1, 841–848.
24.
Góźdź K., Pachelski W., Van Oosterom P., Coors V. 2014. The Possibilities of Using CityGML for 3D Representation of Buildings in the Cadastre. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on 3D Cadastres, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 9–11 November.
25.
Guler D., van Oosterom P., Yomralioglu T. 2022. How to exploit BIM/IFC for 3D registration of ownership rights in multi-storey buildings: an evidence from Turkey. Geocarto Int., 37, 18418–18447. 10.1080/10106049.2022.2142960.
26.
Guler D., Yomralioglu T. 2022. Reviewing the literature on the tripartite cycle containing digital building permit, 3D city modeling, and 3D property ownership. Land Use Policy, 121, Article 106337. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022a.106337.
27.
Guler D. 2024. 3D Modeling of Subsurface Legal Spaces and Boundaries for 3D Land Administration, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 152, 105956. 10.1016/j.tust.2024.105956.
28.
Gürsoy Sürmeneli H., Koeva M., Alkan M. 2022. The Application Domain Extension (ADE) 4D Cadastral Data Model and Its Application in Turkey. Land, 11, 634. 10.3390/land11050634.
29.
Hunt D.V.L., Makana L.O., Jefferson I., Rogers C.D.F. 2016. Liveable cities and urban underground space. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 55, 8–20. 10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.015.
30.
Janečka K., Bobíková D. 2018. Registering the underground objects in the 3D cadastre: A case study of wine cellar located in the vineyard area Tokaj. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 23, 260–270.
31.
Jordabalken J.D. 2024. 3D Modeling of Subsurface Legal Spaces and Boundaries for 3D Land Administration. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 152, 105956. 10.1016/j.tust.2024.105956.
32.
Karabin M. 2011. Rules for Registration of Spatial Objects in Poland in the context of 3D Cadastre requirements. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on 3D Cadastres, Delft, the Netherlands, November 16–18, 433–452.
33.
Karabin M. 2014. The concept of a model approach to Cadastre 3D in Poland: technical and legal aspects. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on 3D Cadastres, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, November 9–11.
34.
Karabin M., Bakuła K., Fijałkowska A., Karabin-Zych M. 2018. Feasibility study of 3D cadastre using different data sources – the case of Warsaw metro. Geod. Vestn., 3, 445–447.
35.
Karabin M., Kitsakis D., Koeva M., Navratil G., Paasch J., Paulsson J., Vućić N., Janeka K., Lisec A. 2018. A layer-to-possession approach in 3D Cadastre – the case of metro . In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on 3D Cadastres, Delft, the Netherlands, October 2–4, 2018, 111–136.
36.
Karabin M., Kitsakis D., Koeva M., Navratil G., Paasch J.M., Paulsson J., Vučić N., Janečka K., Lisec A. 2020. Layer approach to ownership in 3D cadastre in the case of underground tunnels. Land Use Policy, 98, Article 104464. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104464.
37.
Kim S., Heo J. 2017. Development of 3D underground cadastral data model in Korea: Based on land administration domain model. Land Use Policy, 60, 123–138. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.020.
38.
Kwiecień J., Krajewska M., Szopińska K. 2018. Design and implementation of a spatial database for the analysis of the residential real estate market. Geographic Information Systems Conference and Exhibition ‘GIS Odyseja 2018’ – Conferences Proceedings, Perugia, Italy, September 10–14, 328–333.
39.
ISO 19152 standard ‘Geographic information – Land Administration Domain Model (LADM)’ Lantmaterial.
40.
Matuk O. 2019. Conception of Registration of Underground Spatial Structures in Modern 3D Cadastral System. Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, 13, 2. 10.7494/geom.2019.13.2.47.
41.
Parker H.W. 1996. Tunneling, urbanization and sustainable development: The infrastructure connection. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 11, 133–134. 10.1016/0886-7798(96)00020-X.
42.
Perperidou D.G., Sigizis K., Chotza A. 2021. 3D underground property rights of transportation infrastructures: Case study of Piraeus metro station, Greece. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13, 13162. 10.3390/su132313162 .
43.
Ploeger H., Stoter J. 2004. Cadastral registration of cross-boundary infrastructure objects. FIG Working Week, 1–18.
44.
Pouliot J., Bordin P., Cuissard R. 2015. Cadastral mapping for underground networks: A preliminary analysis of user needs. International Cartographic Conference, Brazil, 8–23.
45.
Pouliot J., Girard P. 2016. 3D Cadastre: With or Without Subsurface Utility Network. 5th International FIG 3D Cadastre Workshop, 47–60.
46.
Radulović A., Sladić D., Govedarica M., Ristić A., Jovanović D. 2019. LADM Based Utility Network Cadastre in Serbia. ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf., 8, 206. 10.3390/ijgi8050206.
47.
Ramlakhan R., Kalogianni E., van Oosterom P., Atazadeh B. 2023. Modeling the legal spaces of 3D underground objects in 3D land administration systems. Land Use Policy, 127. Article 106537. 10.1016/j.landusepol .2023.106537.
48.
Regulation of the Minister of Development and Technology of 15 March 2023 amending the regulation on the land and building register (Journal of Laws 2023 item 745). https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/ accessed on 06/11/2024.
49.
Regulation of the Minister of Development, Labor and Technology of 27 July 2021 on the land and building register (Journal of Laws 2021 item 1390). https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/ (accessed: 06.11.2024).
50.
Regulation of the Council of Ministers of 30 December 1999 on the Polish Classification of Construction Objects (PCCO). Journal of Laws of 1999, No. 112, Items 1316. http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.n... (accessed: 21.09.2020).
51.
Saeidian B., Rajabifard A., Atazadeh B., Kalantari M. 2022. Development of an LADMbased Conceptual Data Model for 3D Underground Land Administration in Victoria. 10th International FIG workshop on the Land Administration Domain Model, 127–150.
52.
Saeidian B., Rajabifard A., Atazadeh B., Kalantari M. 2023b. A semantic 3D city model for underground land administration: Development and implementation of an ADE for CityGML 3.0 . Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 140, 105267 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tust.2023.105267.
53.
Sanecki J., Klewski A., Beczkowski K., Pokonieczny K., Stępień G. 2013. The usage of DEM to create the 3D cadastre. Sci. J. Marit. Univ. Szczec., 33, 86–90.
54.
Siejka M., Slusarski M., Zygmunt M. 2013. 3D + time Cadastre, possibility of implementation in Poland. Surv. Rev., 46, 79–89.
55.
Van Oosterom P., Bennett R., Koeva M., Lemmen Ch. 2016. 3D Land Administration for 3D Land Uses. Land Use Policy, 98, November 2020, 104665. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104665.
56.
Yan J., Jaw S.W., Soon K.H., Wieser A., Schrotter G. 2019. Towards an underground utilities 3D data model for land administration. Remote Sens. (Basel), 11, 1957. 10.3390/rs11171957.
57.
Yan J., Van Son R., Soon K.H. 2021. From underground utility survey to land administration: An underground utility 3D data model. Land Use Policy, 102, 105267. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105267.
58.
Zhang Z., Paulsson J., Gong J., Huan J. 2020. Legal framework of urban underground space in China, Sustainability (Switzerland), 12, 1–17. 10.3390/su12208297.
59.
Vermessungs- und Katastergesetze. 2022. Bayerisches Abmarkungsrecht. 10.5771/9783415072664-277.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| ISSN: | 2300-1496 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
