Land consolidation as a policy instrument in agriculture – procedural aspects and sources of delays
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Agricultural Surveying, Cadastre and Photogrammetry, University of Agriculture in Krakow
 
2
Department of Integrated Geodesy and Cartography, AGH University of Krakow
 
 
Submission date: 2025-07-30
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-08-27
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-09-01
 
 
Publication date: 2025-11-04
 
 
Corresponding author
Robert Szewczyk   

The Department of Agricultural Surveying, Cadastre and Photogrammetry, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Balicka, 30-198, Kraków, Poland
 
 
Geomatics, Landmanagement and Landscape 2025;(3)
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Land consolidation is one of the basic processes enabling the shaping and improvement of agricultural land structure. This process is in most cases implemented using State Treasury funds and public resources. Its execution requires an approval decision for the consolidation project. This decision, being an administrative ruling, may be appealed by any party to the proceedings and subsequently challenged in administrative courts. This procedure may lead to protracted proceedings and, consequently, multi-year periods that prevent rational land management and effective exercise of property rights. The article analyses the consolidation process, identifying potential bottlenecks causing delays, with supporting examples from ongoing consolidation proceedings. The land consolidation process in Poland faces significant challenges related to time-consuming procedures and rigid funding frameworks. Current regulations allow for multiple appeals, which are sometimes exploited by claimants blocking entire proceedings. Cases like Lipnica Wielka demonstrate that procedures can drag on for years, restricting owners’ rights. Legal reforms modelled on special-purpose legislation (such as for infrastructure or flood protection) are necessary to separate compensation disputes into separate proceedings and limit procedural abuses. Introducing merit-based requirements for appeals and owner education could accelerate consolidation processes while ensuring economic benefits and better rural land management. The current land consolidation system, though essential for rural development, remains inefficient due to excessive bureaucracy and lack of safeguards against abuse. Urgent legal amendments inspired by special legislative measures are required to ensure procedural efficiency and fairness.
REFERENCES (16)
1.
Asiama K., Voss Bennett R., Rubanje I. 2021. Land consolidation activities in Sub-Saharan Africa towards the agenda 2030: A tale of three countries, Land Use Policy, 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land....
 
2.
Awasthi M. 2014. Socioeconomic determinants of farmland value in India, Land Use Policy, 39, 78‒83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land....
 
3.
Csáki Cs., Lerman Z. 2000. Structural Change in the Farming Sectors in Central and Eastern Europe: Lessons for the EU Accession: Second World Bank/FAO Workshop, June 27‒29, 1999, 465. World Bank Publications.
 
4.
Ertunç E., Muchová Z., Tomić H., Janus J. 2022. Legal, procedural and social aspects of land valuation in land consolidation: a comparative study for selected central and Eastern Europe countries and Turkey Land. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11....
 
5.
Hanus P., Pęska-Siwik A., Szewczyk R. 2018. Spatial analysis of the accuracy of the cadastral parcel boundaries, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
6.
Hanus P., Pęska-Siwik A., Benduch P., Szewczyk R. 2020. Comprehensive assessment of the quality of spatial data in records of parcel boundaries, Measurement, 158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meas....
 
7.
Janus J., Markuszewska I. 2017. Land consolidation. A great need to improve effectiveness. A case study from Poland, Land Use Policy, 65, 143‒153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land....
 
8.
Jiang G., Zhang R., Ma W., Zhou D., Wang X., He X. 2017. Cultivated land productivity potential improvement in land consolidation schemes in Shenyang, China: assessment and policy implications, Land Use Policy, 68, 80‒88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land....
 
9.
Lisec A., Primožič T., Ferlan M., Šumrada R., Drobne S. 2014. Land owners’ perception of land consolidation and their satisfaction with the results – Slovenian experiences, Land Use Policy, 38, 550‒563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land....
 
10.
Tezcan A., Büyüktaş K., Şerife Tülin Akkaya A. 2020. A multi-criteria model for land valuation in the land consolidation, Land Use Policy, 95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land....
 
11.
Wójcik-Leń J., Sobolewska-Mikulska K., Sajnóg N., Leń P. 2018. The idea of rational management of problematic agricultural areas in the course of land consolidation, Land Use Policy, 78, 36‒45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land....
 
12.
Zang Y., Yang Y., Liu Y. 2021. Toward serving land consolidation on the table of sustainability: An overview of the research landscape and future directions, Land Use Policy, 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.land....
 
13.
Program Rozwoju Obszarów Wiejskich 2014‒20. https://www.gov.pl/web/rolnict....
 
14.
Program Rozwoju Obszarów Wiejskich 2023‒27. https://ekonomika.kpodr.pl/202....
 
15.
Ustawa z dnia 26 marca 1982 r. o scalaniu i wymianie gruntów (Dz.U. 1982 nr 11 poz. 80).
 
16.
Ustawa z dnia 14 czerwca 1960 r. ‒ Kodeks postępowania administracyjnego (Dz.U. 1960 nr 30 poz. 168).
 
ISSN:2300-1496
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top