Rural public space design: benefits of collaboration between local authorities and niversities offering landscape architecture courses
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Land Management and Landscape Architecture, University of Agriculture in Krakow
 
2
Centre de recherche d’Ile de France, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)
 
These authors had equal contribution to this work
 
 
Submission date: 2025-10-13
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-11-21
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-11-21
 
 
Publication date: 2025-12-13
 
 
Corresponding author
Barbara Olczak   

Department of Land Management and Landscape, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Aleja Mickiewicza 21, 31-120, Kraków, Poland
 
 
Geomatics, Landmanagement and Landscape 2025;(4)
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The study analysed the cooperation between universities offering courses in landscape architecture, architecture and urban planning on the one hand, and local authorities on the other. The issue was examined in the context of public space design in rural areas, which is much less frequently addressed by theorists and practitioners than public space in cities, as indicated by the literature review. As the students’ projects concern the village of Cellettes in the Centre-Val de Loire region of central France, the authors reviewed the literature on the current framework for the development of public space in France. Particular attention was paid to issues related to the shaping of public space in villages, the changing expectations of rural residents, and the challenges faced by local authorities and designers. The article provides a multidimensional assessment of nineteen projects by fifth-semester landscape architecture students at the University of Agriculture in Krakow who were involved in the design of public spaces. The starting point for the projects was the assumptions presented in the form of two scenarios received from the mayor of Cellettes. The authors drew attention to the diversity of the projects, which may be valuable for authorities and residents in terms of functional and spatial decisions, as well as the choice of small-scale architecture, vegetation, and materials.
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Aubert F., Gaigné C. 2023. Les espaces ruraux et la politique d’aménagement du territoire. INRA sciences sociales, Dec 2023, Halshs-01485722f.
 
2.
Banos V., Candau J. 2008. L’émergence d’un espace public en mileu rural: jalons méthodologiques. In: Espaces en transactions. R. Séchet, I. Garat, D. Zeneidi (eds.). 10.4000/books.pur.414.
 
3.
Berry L.H., Koski J., Verkuijl C., Strambo C., Piggot G. 2019. Making space: how public participation shapes environmental decision-making. Stokholm Environment Institute.
 
4.
Birkner N., Mix Y-G. 2014. Qu’est-ce que l’espace public? Dix-huitième siècle, 1, 46, 285‒307.
 
5.
Bordes V. 2006. Espaces publiques, espaces pour tous? Espaces de la jeunesse, espaces publics: organisation locale, Rennes, France. Halshs-00326382.
 
6.
Bouquet B., Debéchot P. 2018. Quelques enjeux autour des territoires ruraux. Vie sociale, 2, 22, 13‒31.
 
7.
Buława B., Zając J., Buława P. 2025. Models of urban development as a spatial continuum of the historic centre of the town of Prusice, Poland, in the context of its new economic opportunities. Środowisko Mieszkaniowe/Housing Environment, 51, 2.
 
8.
Cao J., Kang J. 2021. The influence of companion factors on soundscape evaluation in urban public space. Sustainable Cities and Society, 69. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102860.
 
9.
Cellettes / Agglopolys Communauté d’agglomération de Blois. Cellettes ‒ Agglopolys ‒ Communauté d’agglomération de Blois [accessed: 09.07.2025].
 
10.
Delfosse C., George P-M. 2013. Artistes et espace rural: l’émergence d’une dynamique créative. Artistes et territoires créatifs en Europe, 2. DOI: 10.4000/tem.2147.
 
11.
Études d’aménagement paysager et de mise en valeur de l’aire de loisirs des bords du Beuvron, Octobre 2023. 41 Loir-et-Cher, Conseil d’architecture, d’urbanisme et de l’environnement.
 
12.
Ghel J. 1987. Life between buildings. Using public space.
 
13.
Gibou Ch. 2009. L’espace public comme lieu de transactions sociales. Une lecture à partir des practiques de loisirs urbains. Pensée plurielle, 1, 20, 153‒165. DOI: 10.3917/pp.020.0153.
 
14.
Guilpain M. 2023. Aménager des espaces publics favorables à la santé en contexte rural: l’exemple du bourg de la commune d’Augan (Morbihan). Géoconfluences, décembre.
 
15.
Karta przestrzeni publicznej. 2009. Towarzystwo Urbanistów Polskich [accessed: 15.07.2025].
 
16.
Kubica E. 1999. Sanacja przestrzeni zdeprecjonowanych poprzez zerwanie więzi semantycznych. Rewaloryzacja kwartałów śródmiejskich – ocena stanu istniejącego w aspekcie metodologicznym. Publikacja w ramach badań kierunkowych Katedry Urbanistyki i Planowania Przestrzennego Wydziału Architektury Politechniki Śląskiej, Gliwice.
 
17.
Lacquement G. 2020. Les espaces ruraux défavorisés: une catégorie de l’aménagement du territoire en Allemagne. In: Espaces fragiles – Construction scientifique, dynamique territoriales et action publique. B. Pascal, E. Roth (eds.), 73–94.
 
18.
Mansournia S., Bahrami B., Mahmoudi Farahani L., Aram F. 2020. Understanding children’s perceptions and activities in urban public spaces: The case study of Zrêbar Lake Waterfront in Kurdistan. Urban Studies. DOI: 10.1177/0042098020903008.
 
19.
Mebirouk H. 2023. Lire, concevoir et gérér les espaces public en ville: une participation implicative des citoyens. Formation doctorale. Université Tahri Mohammed Béchar, Faculté de Technologie, Département d’Architecture et d’Urbanisme. Ministere de L’enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche Scientifique [accessed: 14.07.2025].
 
20.
Micek M., Staszewska S. 2019. Urban and rural public spaces: development issues and qualitative assessment. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series, 45. DOI: 10.2478/bog-2019-0025.
 
21.
Musée Promenade Louis Derbré, Château de Conon [accessed: 14.07.2025].
 
22.
Muras P., Turyk B. 2016. Konkurs studencki na Rynek w Jerzmanowicach w ramach współpracy Wydziału Biotechnologii i Ogrodnictwa oraz Urzędu Gminy Jerzmanowice-Przeginia. Biuletyn Informacyjny, 2, 1(99). Uniwersytet Rolniczy im. Hugona Kołłątaja w Krakowie.
 
23.
Nowy rynek w Szczebrzeszynie – konsultacje społeczne. 2024. Miejski Dom Kultury w Szczebrzeszynie [accessed: 14.07.2025].
 
24.
Ning X. 2021. Review of Urban Public Space Researches from Multidisciplinary Perspective. Landscape Architecture, 28(4), 52‒57. DOI: 10.14085/j.fjyl.2021.04.0052.06.
 
25.
Olczak B., Nawrotek M. 2018. Public participation in shaping the central space of the Jerzmanowice village located in the buffer zone of the Ojców National Park. Geomatics, Landmanagement and Landscape, 2. DOI: 10.15576/GLL/2018.2.53.
 
26.
Paprzyca K. 2017. An innovative model of co-operation between university, local government and business in the Faculty of Architecture at Cracow University of Technology. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 15, 4.
 
27.
Périodiques régionaux. 1976. Revue d’histoire de l’Église de France, 62, 169, 441‒503 [accessed: 09.07.2025].
 
28.
Poirel M. 2021. Mobilité des personnes âgées dans les territoires ruraux: quelles perspectives en France? TraHs, 12. DOI: 10.25965/trahs.4190.
 
29.
Soszyński D., Sowińska-Świerkosz B., Gawryluk A. 2016. Kształtowanie wiejskich przestrzeni publicznych – ocena rozwiązań krajobrazowych w wybranych gminach Polesia Zachodniego. Prace Komisji Krajobrazu Kulturowego, 34, 149–162.
 
30.
Šimkovičová B., Šeligová A., Smatanová K. 2024. Lived experience in urban design education: enhancing students’ knowledge, design insight and self-reflection. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 22, 4.
 
ISSN:2300-1496
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top