Evolution of online mapping: from Web 1.0 to Web 6.0
1
Uniwersytet Rolniczy w Krakowie
Katedra Gospodarki Przestrzennej i Architektury Krajobrazu
Publication date: 2020-03-31
Geomatics, Landmanagement and Landscape 2020;(1)
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Web 5.0 performance appears limited only if seen through the prism of technological development. It presents the web as a human-controlled tool, which uses algorithms to attempt to personalize, search, and improve user experience, and to act for or on behalf of a person. Meanwhile, in the Web 6.0 era, the world will be quite unlike what we know today. For instance, it may turn out that Web 6.0 will mean the migration of human consciousness to cyberspace or to an unspecified “cloud” (of data, perhaps?). Will online maps even be needed in such a world?
The Web, seen in its current way, is “anchored in metabolism”. Web 6.0 endeavours to face up to that. Namely, Web 6.0 aspires to be an independent entity that functions in the Internet ecosystem, depending on the presence of electro-impulses, but without the necessity of “anchoring” on a durable data carrier. This development path could be indicated by the use of artificial intelligence, data analytics and (genetic) algorithms in Web 4.0. At the same time, it is difficult to say whether Web 6.0 will end up as one synthetic, self-conscious organism or a collective of “other identities”, i.e. the personalities of individual devices integrated in the network.
REFERENCES (60)
1.
Bedau M.A., McCaskill J.S., Packard N.H., Rasmussen S., Adami C., Green D.G., Ikegami T., Kaneko K., Ray T.S. 2000. Open problems in artificial life. Artificial Life, 6(4), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1162/106454....
2.
Benito-Osorio D., Peris-Ortiz M., Armengot C.R., Colino A. 2013. Web 5.0: the future of emotional competences in higher education. Global Business Perspectives, 1(3), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40196....
3.
Berners-Lee T., Cailliau A., Luotonen H.F., Nielsen A. 1994. The World-Wide Web. Communications of the ACM, 37(8), 76–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1796....
4.
Berners-Lee T. 1998. The World Wide Web: A very short personal historyW3C, http://bit.ly/2xFhjgY.
5.
Black M.A., Cartwright W.E. 2005. Web cartography & Web-enabled geographic information systems (GIS). New possibilities, new challenges. The 22nd International Cartographic Conference, A Coruña, Spain, 9–16 July 2005. http://bit.ly/2JAaAKQ.
6.
Bruns A. 2007. Produsage: Towards a Broader Framework for User-Led Content Creation. In Creativity and Cognition. Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity & Cognition, ACM, Washington, DC.
7.
Buenstorf G., Fornahl D. 2009. B2C-bubble to cluster: the dot-com boom, spin-off entrepreneurship, and regional agglomeration. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 19(3), 349–378.
8.
Cerba O., Cepicky J. 2012. Web services for thematic maps. In Online maps with APIs and webservices, 141–155. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
9.
Choudhury N. 2014. World wide web and its journey from web 1.0 to web 4.0. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 5(6), 8096–8100.
10.
Cormode G., Krishnamurthy B. 2008. Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. First Monday, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v13....
11.
Crampton J.W. 2002. Interactivity types in geographic visualization. Cartography and Geogr. Inform. Science, 29(2), 85–98.
12.
DeLong J.B., Magin K. 2006. A short note on the size of the dot-com bubble (No. w12011). National Bureau of Economic Research.
14.
Fleerackers T., Meyvis M. 2018. Digital Evolution. Past, present and future outlook of digital technology. Flat World Blog. https://flatworldbusiness.word... [accessed: 24 January 2020].
15.
Fleerackers T., Meyvis M. 2019. Web 1.0 vs Web 2.0 vs Web 3.0 vs Web 4.0 vs Web 5.0 – A bird’s eye on the evolution and definition. Flat World Blog. http://bit.ly/2X87liz [accessed: 24 January 2020].
16.
Fuchs C., Hofkirchner W., Schafranek M., Raffl C., Sandoval M., Bichler R. 2010. Theoretical foundations of the web: cognition, communication, and co-operation. Towards an understanding of Web 1.0, 2.0, 3.0. Future Internet, 2(1), 41-59. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi2010....
17.
Gaither Ch., Chmielewski D.C. 2006. Fears of Dot-Com Crash, Version 2.0. Los Angeles Times.
18.
Goodchild M.F. 2007. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708....
19.
Hall W., Tiropanis T. 2012. Web evolution and Web Science. Computer Networks, 56, 3859–3865. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.co....
20.
Hołyst R. 2019. Życie w pamięci RAM – ewolucja cyberorganizmów. Instytut Chemii Fizycznej PAN i Szkoła Nauk Ścisłych. http://bit.ly/2LJEa3w [accessed: 24 January 2020].
21.
Iosifescu Enescu I., Panchaud N.H., Heitzler M., Iosifescu Enescu C.M., Hurni L. 2015. Towards Better WMS Maps Through the Use of the Styled Layer Descriptor and Cartographic Conflict Resolution for Linear Features. The Cartographic Journal, 52(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/000870....
22.
Kambil A. 2008. What is your Web 5.0 strategy? Journal of Business Strategy, 29(6), 56–58.
23.
Keen A. 2007. Kult amatora. Jak Internet niszczy kulturę. Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne, Warszawa.
24.
Kowalczyk A., Pokojski W. 2018. Nowe technologie w turystyce: przejście od map analogo-.
27.
Kraak M.-J. 2001. Settings and methods for web cartography. [In:] Web cartography. Developments and prospects, ed. M.-J. Kraak, A. Brown. Taylor & Francis, London–New York.
28.
Kraay A., Ventura J. 2007. The Dot-Com Bubble, the Bush Deficits, and the U.S. Current Account. In G7 Current Account Imbalances: Sustainability and Adjustment, 457–495. University of Chicago Press. http://www.nber.org/chapters/c....
29.
Król K. 2015a. Ocena wybranych technik tworzenia interaktywnych map lokalizacji obiektów przestrzennych. Acta Sci. Pol., ser. Formatio Circumiectus, 14(4), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.15576/ASP.F....
30.
Król K. 2015b. Tworzenie statycznych map obiektów przestrzennych z wykorzystaniem metody parametryzacji adresu zasobu sieciowego – analiza porównawcza. Acta Sci. Pol., ser. Formatio Circumiectus, 14(4), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.15576/ASP.F....
31.
Król K. 2015c. Conception of a touristic map and nature protection forms created with use.
32.
of open data sources and free software on a Grybów commune example. Geomatics, Landmanagement and Landscape (GLL), 4, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.15576/GLL/2....
33.
Król K. 2018. Wizards and generators in teaching information technologies to students of engineering. Engineering for Rural Development, 17, 1260–1269. https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev....
34.
Król K. 2019a. Forgotten agritourism: abandoned websites in the promotion of rural tourism in Poland. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 10(3), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-0....
35.
Król K. 2019b. Zoomlens – graphic form of data presentation on a web map, comparison of chosen tool and usage examples. Engineering for Rural Development, 18, 1641–1648. https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev....
36.
Król K., Prus B. 2017. Dynamic presentation of static maps using GIS and jQuery JavaScript tools taking data of soil maps in Poland as an example. Geographic Information Systems Conference and Exhibition “Gis Odyssey” 2017, 203–212.
37.
Król K., Prus B. 2018. Application of interactive charts in the evaluation of socio-economic development of regions. The case of Poland. Acta Sci. Pol., ser. Formatio Circumiectus, 17(3), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.15576/ASP.F....
38.
Król K., Szomorova L. 2015. The possibilities of using chosen jQuery JavaScript components in creating interactive maps. Geomatics, Landmanagement and Landscape (GLL), 2, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.15576/gll/2....
39.
Kwiatkowska E.M. 2014. Rozwój Internetu rzeczy – szanse i zagrożenia. Internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny, 8(3), 60–70.
40.
Lemmens R., Deng D. 2008. Web 2.0 and semantic web: Clarifying the meaning of spatial features. Semantic Web meets Geospatial Applications, AGILE.
41.
Li D., Shao Z. 2009. The new era for geo-information. Science in China Series F: Information Sciences, 52(7), 1233–1242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432....
42.
Macioch A., Malmon G. 2010. Funkcje interaktywne współczesnych map elektronicznych. Polski Przegląd Kartograficzny, 42(4), 331–353.
43.
Merchant B. 2014. What It Was Like to Surf the Web in 1989. Motherboard Blog. https://www.vice.com/en_us/art....
44.
O’Reilly T. 2005. Web 2.0: compact definition. O’Reilly Media. http://radar.oreilly.com/2005/... [accessed: 24 January 2020].
45.
O’Reilly T. 2007. What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications & Strategies, 65, 17–37.
46.
Patel K. 2013. Incremental journey for World Wide Web: introduced with Web 1.0 to recent Web 5.0 – a survey paper. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 3(10), 410–417.
47.
Peterson M.P. 2003. Maps and the Internet: An Introduction. [In:] Maps and the Internet, ed. M.P. Peterson. Elsevier Science, Oxford.
48.
Peterson M.P. 2012. Online Maps with APIs and WebServices. Springer Science & Business Media.
49.
Plewe B. 2007. Web cartography in the United States. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 34(2), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304....
50.
Ray T.S. 1991. An approach to the synthesis of life. [In:] Artificial Life II, eds. C.G. Langton,.
52.
Ritt A., Hörtler P. 2008. Security Aspects in Web 2.0 Mashup Systems, Technology, Altenbergerstrabe 69, 4020. Linz, Austria. http://bit.ly/2xbZ56u [accessed: 24 January 2020].
53.
Sarowski Ł. 2017. Od Internetu Web 1.0 do Internetu Web 4.0 – ewolucja form przestrzeni komunikacyjnych w globalnej sieci. Rozprawy Społeczne, 11(1), 32–39.
54.
Siejka M., Ślusarski M., Zygmunt M. 2014. 3D+time Cadastre, possibility of implementation in Poland. Survey Review, 46(335), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1179/175227....
55.
Tierra 1991. Tierra.doc 17-3-98 documentation for the Tierra Simulator. http://life.ou.edu/pubs/doc/in... [accessed: 24 January 2020].
56.
Valliere D., Peterson R. 2004. Inflating the bubble: examining dot-com investor behaviour. Venture Capital, 6(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/136910....
57.
Veenendaal B. 2016. Eras of Web mapping developments: past, present and future. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences, 41, 247–252. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsa....
58.
Walkowska J. 2012. Jeśli nie Web 2.0, to co? Biuletyn EBIB, 2(129), Koniec 2.0? http://bit.ly/325rauw [accessed: 24 January 2020].
59.
Zeldman J. 2006. Web 3.0. A List Apart. http://www.alistapart.com/arti... [accessed: 24 January 2020].
60.
Zygmunt M. 2017. Circular arc approximation using polygons. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 322, 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.....
| ISSN: | 2300-1496 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
