Assessment and mapping of areas at risk of flooding using a combined AHP and GIS multi-criteria analysis model ‒ case study of Sidi Aissa city (Algeria)
More details
Hide details
1
City, Environment, Hydraulics and Sustainable Development Laboratory, Urban Technology Management Institute, University of Mohamed Boudiaf, M’sila, Algeria
2
Cedete Laboratory, UFR LLSH, Department of Geography, University of Orléans, France
Submission date: 2024-11-22
Final revision date: 2025-01-14
Acceptance date: 2025-02-10
Publication date: 2025-04-13
Corresponding author
Mohammed Ben Halima
City, Environment, Hydraulics and Sustainable Development Laboratory, Urban Technology Management Institute, University of Mohamed Boudiaf, M’sila, Algeria
Geomatics, Landmanagement and Landscape 2025;(1)
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Floods are among the most hazardous natural disasters, which pose significant threats to human lifeat both global and national scales due to severe human, material, and environmental losses. The increasing frequency of floods, compared to other natural hazards, highlights the urgent need of their evaluation and the mitigation of their impacts. This study aimed to assess and map flood-prone areas in the city of Sidi Aissa, Algeria, using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and geographic information systems (GIS). The city was chosen because of the three rivers running through it. A model combining a multi-criteria statistical approach and GIS was employed. The study focused on analyzing the factors influencing flood occurrence, including land use, elevation, slope, drainage density, distance from river and roads, topographic wetness
index (T.W.I), and normalized difference vegetation index (N.D.V.I), To calculate the weights of these factors in the GIS environment, the AHP method was applied, resulting in maps specific to each criterion. The results revealed that land use (21.7%) and distance from river (18.2%) are the most critical factors influencing flood susceptibility and damage to nearby buildings. The study shaped a flood susceptibility map divided into three categories: areas with very low flood susceptibility, accounting for 29% of the total area; areas with moderate flood susceptibility, accounting for 40% and areas highly susceptible to flooding, making up 31%. Furthermore, the study demonstrated the effectiveness of using AHP and GIS in simulating potential floods and identifying flood-prone areas, thereby highlighting their importance in planning and mitigating flood risks in the future.
REFERENCES (25)
1.
Allafta H., Opp C. 2021. GIS-based multi-criteria analysis for flood prone areas mapping in the trans- boundary Shatt Al-Arab basin, Iraq-Iran. GeomaticsNatl Hazards Risk, 12(1), 2087–2116.
2.
Aydin M.C., Sevgi Birincioğlu E. 2022. Flood risk analysis using GIS based analytical hierarchy process: a case study of Bitlis Province. Appl. Water Sci., 12(6), 122.
3.
Balica S.F., Wright N.G., Van der Meulen F. 2012. A flood vulnerability index for coastal cities and its use in assessing climate change impacts. Nat Hazards, 64, 73–105.
4.
Cabrera J.S., Lee H.S. 2018. Impacts of climate change on flood-prone areas in Davao Oriental, Philippines. Water, 10(7), 893.
5.
Das S. 2018. Geographic information system and AHP-based flood hazard zonation of Vaitarna basin, Maharashtra, India. Arabian J. Geosciences, 11, 576.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517....
6.
Das S. 2019. Geospatial mapping of flood susceptibility and hydro-geomorphic response to the floods in Ulhas basin, India. Remote Sens. Appl., 14, 60–74.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j. rsase.2019.02.006.
7.
Desalegn H., Mulu A. 2021. Flood vulnerability assessment using GIS at Fetam watershed, upper Abbay basin, Ethiopia. Heliyon, 7(1), e05865.
8.
Elkhrachy I. 2022. Flash flood water depth estimation using SAR images, digital elevation models, and machine learning algorithms. Remote Sens. (Basel), 14, 440.
https://doi.org/10. 3390/RS14030440.
9.
Hagos Y., Andualem T., Yibeltal M., Mengie M. 2022. Potential floodprone area identification and mapping using GIS, MCD, Dega Damot, Ethiopia. Appl. Water Sci., 12.
https://doi.org/10. 1007/ s13201- 022- 01674-8.
10.
Khosravi K., Pourghasemi H.R., Chapi K., Bahri M. 2016b. Flash flood susceptibility analysis and its mapping using different bivariate models in Iran: A comparison between Shannon’s entropy, statistical index, and weighting factor models. Environ. Monit. Assess., 188, 656.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661....
11.
Lin L., Wu Z., Liang Q. 2019. Urban flood susceptibility analysis using a GIS-based multi-criteria analysis framework. Nat Hazards, 97, 455–475.
12.
Liuzzo L., Sammartano V., Freni G. 2019. Comparison between different distributed methods for flood susceptibility mapping. Water Resour. Manag., 33, 3155–3173.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269....
13.
Master Plan for Development and Construction, Sidi Aissa. 2008.
14.
Negese A., Worku D., Shitaye A., Getnet H. 2022. Potential flood-prone area identification and mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making and analytical hierarchy process in DegaDamot district, northwestern Ethiopia. Appl. Water Sci., 12(12), 255.
15.
Ogato G.S., Bantider A., Abebe K., Geneletti D. 2020. Geographic information system (GIS)-based multicriteria analysis of flooding hazard and risk in Ambo Town and its watershed, West Shoa zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. J. Hydrol. Region Stud., 27, 100659.
16.
Paul G.C., Saha S., Hembram T.K. 2019. Application of the GIS-based probabilistic models for mapping the flood susceptibility in Bansloi sub-basin of Gangabhagirathi river and their comparison. Remote Sens. Earth Syst. Sci., 2, 120–146.
https://doi.org/10. 1007/s41976-019-00018-6.
17.
Rahmati O., Haghizadeh A., Pourghasemi H.R., Noormohamadi F. 2016. Gully erosion susceptibility mapping: The role of GIS-based bivariate statistical models and their comparison. Nat. Hazards, 82, 1231–1258.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069....
18.
Ramesh V., Iqbal S.S. 2022. Urban flood susceptibility zonation mapping using evidential belief function, frequency ratio and fuzzy gamma operator models in GIS: a case study of Greater Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. Geocarto Intl., 37(2), 581–606.
19.
Riazi M., Khosravi K., Shahedi K., Ahmad S., Jun C., Bateni S.M. 2023. Enhancing flood susceptibility modeling using multi-temporal SAR images, CHIRPS data, and hybrid machine learning algorithms. Sci. Total Environ. 871, 162066.
https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162066.
20.
Saaty R.W. 1987. The analytic hierarchy process – what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Model, 9(3–5), 161–176.
21.
Samanta S., Pal D.K., Palsamanta B. 2018b. Flood susceptibility analysis through remote sensing, GIS and frequency ratio model. Appl. Water Sci., 8, 66.
https://doi.org/10. 1007/s13201-018-0710-1.
22.
Shen L., Zhang Y., Ullah S., Pepin N., Ma Q. 2021. Changes in snow depth under elevation-dependent warming over the Tibetan Plateau. Atmos. Sci. Lett., 22.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.10....
23.
Tehrany M.S., Pradhan B., Jebur M.N. 2015. Flood susceptibility analysis and its verification using a novel ensemble support vector machine and frequency ratio method. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 29, 1149–1165.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477...- 1021-9.
24.
Waga K., Malinen J., Tokola T. 2020. A Topographic Wetness Index for Forest Road Quality Assessment: An Application in the Lakeland Region of Finland. Forests, 11(1165), 1–13.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f111....
25.
World Health Organization report, 2023.